Filed under: Health Freedom | Tags: consumers, FDA, H.R.2117, health Freedom Act, Ron Paul, support
TAKE ACTION: Support Ron Paul’s Health Freedom Protection Act, H.R. 2117
In this Presidential election year many candidates are clamoring to offer health policies that simply maintain the status quo and enable the pharmaceutical industry to maintain its stranglehold on consumers. These candidates would also allow the FDA to continue to shirk its duty to protect consumers from the often dangerous or lethal drugs big pharma is all too eager to push on the public. It is especially important at this time for our elected representatives to support policy and legislation that puts consumers in control of their own health decisions.
Ron Paul’s Health Freedom Protection Act, a bill first introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2005, would give consumers access to truthful, non-misleading health information and end FDA and FTC censorship by making it easier for manufacturers of vitamins, supplements, and other foods to display health claims on product labels.
to take action copy and paste into your browser: http://www.citizens.org/action-alerts/take-action-support-ron-pauls-health-freedom-protection-act-h-r-2117
or try click here:
Take Action – Urge Congress to support the Health Freedom Protection Act
H.R. 2117 was re-introduced in the House for the 110th Congressional session on Wednesday, May 2, 2007, but has not yet attained the level of support it enjoyed in the last Congressional session.
That is why it is critical that you urge your Representative to support the Health Freedom Protection Act, H.R. 2117, by signing on as a cosponsor. With your help we can surpass the level of support the bill enjoyed in the 109th session, and bring it to the floor for a vote.
Background
The Food and Drug Administration prohibits with an absolute prior restraint every claim in the market that a nutrient treats a disease. It is, for example, illegal for you to be told in the market that prune juice treats constipation; that glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate treat osteoarthritis; that omega-3 fatty acids reduce the risk of sudden death heart attack; or that folic acid reduces the risk of alzheimer’s disease. Each of those claims is demonstrably true, yet prohibited by the FDA.
Why does the FDA ban speech that can heal and save lives?
It reserves to the pharmaceutical industry the right to make claims about therapeutic effects, ensuring that drug companies have a monopoly on the making of such claims and the economic rewards that come from them. The rights violation carries with it loss of health and sometimes life. It also causes consumers who might well find an ailment treatable with inexpensive and non-toxic dietary elements to perceive costly and side effect laden drugs as their only alternative.
It is untruthful to claim that foods and elements in foods lack therapeutic effects. Many dietary ingredients have such effects. Telling the truth about those effects in the market can land you in jail. The Federal Trade Commission prosecutes parties who make advertising claims about the effects of foods and nutrients on the body. It does not limit those prosecutions to parties that actually deceive consumers. It also does not limit those prosecutions to products that fail to perform as advertised. The FTC has refused to define an objective standard of review that would constrain its power to those cases in which ads actually deceive. Instead, it exercises broad, unbridled discretion in charging and condemning parties as deceptive advertisers. Moreover, no one in this country should be held by the government to be a deceptive advertiser unless the government proves that consumers have in fact been deceived. H.R. 2117, the Health Freedom Protection Act, will end FDA and FTC censorship. Public support for the bill is critical. This is your chance to let Congress know you will not sit back while agencies of your federal government take your freedoms away!
Filed under: Sweeteners | Tags: chemicals, Chlorodance, coffee, DDT, insecticides, Lindane, Splenda
Coffee with Cream and Pesticide?
By Jayson Kroner, C.S.N.
The television commercials are brilliantly-crafted fusions of dancing plum fairies waving wands of calorie-free pixie dust. The advertising slogan is legendary; a perfectly penned typeset tap-dance that’s been delicately dusted with the sweet, sweet overtones of sugary goodness for all those wise enough to jump on this now billion dollar bandwagon. You’ve got to hand it to the marketing efforts that continue to fuel the sales of Splenda®.
This unheard of and seemingly overnight success has crowned Splenda® the number one selling branded sweetener in the United States. It is available in over 80 countries and can be found in more than 4,000 products. But in light of its mainstream recognition, a number of questions have yet to be answered. Is it natural? Is it safe? Has the American public been duped into believing that this “chemical” sweetener might actually be healthy? What aren’t they telling us?
Let’s examine.
At the core of this confusion, is one of the most controversial marketing slogans ever put down on paper; “Tastes like sugar, because it’s made from sugar”. And yes, there is a bit of truth to this. Splenda® does, in fact, start off as a sugar molecule. However, the product that remains at the end of a patented 5 step process isn’t even close to what most people know as “sugar.” Sadly, the average health seeking consumer doesn’t have the time, the resources, or the motivation to investigate this multi-million dollar marketing genius. And honestly, why would they? After all, it’s made from sugar, right? Let’s not kid ourselves. One trip to the company’s website is all it takes to quickly realize that Splenda® is not natural, and it is most certainly not sugar. Splenda® is a synthesized chemical, plain and simple. Speaking of chemicals, the name itself waves a red flag all its own. Sucralose, the chemical also known as Splenda®, bears a remarkable resemblance to the word sucrose—a word used to define common white table sugar. But make no mistake, by the time “sucralose” finds its way into those bright yellow packets, there isn’t much left to suggest that sugar ever existed.
Here’s how it’s done: Starting with a molecule of sugar, three hydroxyl groups (atoms composed of hydrogen and oxygen) are selectively removed and replaced with three atoms of chlorine. That’s right, chlorine. By the time the process has been carried out to completion, said sugar molecule has been transformed into a chlorocarbon. And in case you’re not familiar with chlorocarbons, allow me to bring you up to speed.
Chlorocarbons are non-natural substances. A few of their more well known family members include carbon tetrachloride, trichlorethelene and methylene chloride— chemical agents that have absolutely no place in a healthy, human diet. On its own, chlorine is commonly founds in a number of insecticides, bleach and bleach-based products, as well as household and commercial disinfectants. Some of the more famous members of this group include DDT, Chlorodane and Lindane.
The company brags of extensive research that demonstrates its safety. Keep in mind, though, that the majority of the studies used to gain approval as a food additive were conducted on lab rats, mice, rabbits, guinea pigs and other animals.
The point to be made here is that you, as a health-minded consumer, have the right to know what you’re putting in your body. If you’re under the impression that those little yellow packets contain something natural, you might want to reconsider your options. Or at the very least, do some more homework.
Because honestly, if their marketing slogan read something along the lines of, “Tastes 600 times sweeter than sugar, because it’s made with chlorine,” how fast would you run out and buy some?
Think about it.
Filed under: Uncategorized
Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!